People approach the very sensitive subject of marriage, divorce, and remarriage in several ways.  Some, ignorant of what Jesus says about it, are a law to themselves and come up with any number of “alternatives” including living together without marriage, homosexuality, adultery, and the like.  Some have become stricter than Jesus, saying that divorce for any reason is a sin.  This is making a law where God has not (Prov. 30:6; Rev. 22:18-19).    Some have become less strict than Jesus, making allowance where He has not.  One of the most common allowances is the idea this law does not apply to everyone.  Also, some have tried to make the sin of adultery something other than what context shows it to be.  Here are five reasons why God’s law of marriage, divorce, and remarriage applies to all.

(1) Jesus Goes Back To The Beginning Of Creation (19:4,8).  Jesus is not teaching something that was limited to His own time and it certainly was not an articulation of the Law of Moses (see 19:7-8).  Instead, Jesus goes back to the dawn of time to Adam and Eve in the Garden.  Jesus, in giving His command, reaches behind Moses to “the beginning.”  This shows a timelessness to the command.  God designed it a certain way, man distorted it, and Jesus dictates a new way that is universal in nature.  He points ahead by pointing back to the beginning.

(2) What God Has Joined Should Not Be Separated (19:6).  When two people have a right to be married, whether or not a preacher or religious person performs the ceremony, God is joining those two together.  Verse nine gives God’s only exception for allowing the marriage bond to be severed and only then for the one against whom fornication is committed (the “innocent party”)(see the last phrase in verse nine).  There is no qualifying phrase beyond that one exception to justify ending one marriage and forming another.

(3) Jesus’ Teaching Is Explicitly Clear (19:9).  It truly takes “expert help” to misunderstand what Jesus teaches here.  Take out the exception and here is how the “rule” reads:  “Whoever divorce his wife and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.”  That could not be clearer!  The exception is also perfectly clear.

(4) The Disciples’ Reaction (19:10).  Their reaction is actually extreme.  They conclude that it is better not to get married.  Jesus does not validate such thinking, but it gives us insight in to what they understood.  Jesus’ law for marriage, divorce, and remarriage is stringent!  If “adultery” merely meant “covenant breaking,” would the disciples react so?  One would simply need to “repent” of having broken their marriage vows, and then enter another marriage.  If Jesus meant that, the disciples would hardly have reacted at all.

(5) Christ’s Final Response About Eunuchs (19:11-12).  Jesus clears up any doubt by how He ends this discussion.  He speaks of three classes of eunuchs-those born that way, those made that way by men, and those who make themselves that way “for the kingdom of heaven’s sake.”  Being delicate here, we understand what it means to be a “eunuch.”  That cuts to the heart of what our Lord is saying and one of the blessings accompanying the marriage relationship.  Those who divorce for reasons other than the exception Jesus gives in verse nine would have to be in that third category of person discussed in verse 12.

This is not a truth that can be delivered with cold stare, pounding fist, and judgmental heart.  It is one that more likely will be accompanied with breaking heart, blinding tears, and extreme hesitation.  Probably nothing is more unpleasant to teach, but as part of the “whole counsel” (Acts 20:27) it must be taught.  Culture cannot be the authority on this matter.  Neither can emotion.  Instead, as always, we must let Jesus be the authority (cf. Col. 1:18; 3:17; Matt. 28:18).

–Neal Pollard