A Quarterly Journal

 

 

 

"LIGHT FOR OUR AGE"

 

 

October, 2018

Volume 10

Issue #4

 

 

"Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path."

Psalm 119:105

 

bible-banner.jpg

 

 

 

 

Feature One: Editorial

 

 

 

Robert T. Oliver

         

CAN CHRISTIANS CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS AS A FAMILY HOLIDAY?

 

         I wanted you to read my father's article before this one. I totally agree with what he taught about Christmas. But that still raises a question, "If Christmas is based on paganism, how can I, as a Christian, celebrate it in any way? Do I honor paganist practices when I do what the pagans did? Consider the example and history of the Christmas tree.

"Dating back centuries before Christ, cultures brought evergreen trees, plants, and leaves into their homes upon the arrival of the winter solstice, which occurs in the northern hemisphere between December 21st and 22nd. Although the specific practices were different in each country and culture, the symbolization was generally the same: to celebrate the return of life at the beginning of winter's decline."     http://www.christmastreehistory.net/pagan

         I know there are some Christians who believe it is sinful to even make a family holiday out of the Christmas season even if there is no religious activity associated with their observance. The Bible teaches us to be ready to give anyone an answer to our hope in Christ. (1 Peter 3:15). This is a Bible question and deserves a Biblical answer.

         Some might want to approach this question by asking what can be wrong with giving gifts or having the family gather around for an enjoyable meal? Others might respond by saying we are honoring Christ in a way he does not choose to be honored, so that is wrong. This subject can be "argued" for hours and not apply what the Bible teaches. But when you come down to it, that is the only thing that matters. If the Bible is against it, then no matter how much we might enjoy it, we should avoid it. If the Bible does not condemn it, then we should not condemn those that observe it non-religiously.

         Let me direct your attention to a passage that you might believe has nothing to do with Christmas, yet one I believe that completely answers this question. The subject in 1 Corinthians 8 is the eating of meat that had been sacrificed to pagan gods. This was one of the questions put before the apostle Paul. He answers the question in verse 4, but comments further in verses 7-13. First notice verse 4: "Therefore, as to the eating of food offered to idols, we know that "an idol has no real existence," and that "there is no God but one." It was important for Paul to point out that these pagan gods did not exist. Because of this, the eating of that meat was called by Paul, a "liberty". 

         Paul, however, has much more to say about this subject. Read what Paul wrote in verses 7-13. "However, not all possess this knowledge. But some, through former association with idols, eat food as really offered to an idol, and their conscience, being weak, is defiled.Food will not commend us to God. We are no worse off if we do not eat, and no better off if we do.But take care that this right of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak.For if anyone sees you who have knowledge eating in an idol's temple, will he not be encouraged, if his conscience is weak, to eat food offered to idols?And so by your knowledge this weak person is destroyed, the brother for whom Christ died.Thus, sinning against your brothers and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ.Therefore, if food makes my brother stumble, I will never eat meat, lest I make my brother stumble."

         Notice Paul does tell them they may eat of this meat as the bold print above indicates. Yet, there is a stipulation given. They may eat of this meat provided it causes no weak Christians to stumble and fall away from Christ. Paul put it this way, if a weak Christian sees you eating this meat they may believe you are honoring the pagan god to whom it was sacrificed, and feel justified in honoring a pagan god in this manner. There was nothing wrong in eating the meat, but the weak brother must be considered. 

         Our question revolves around a similar situation. We know that God did not authorize our honoring the birthday of Christ, for we were not given a day in which to celebrate it. Therefore, in that "faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God."(Romans 10:17), and in dealing with the same subject in Romans 14:23 Paul said: "And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin."In that God did not direct us to observe Christmas as a religious holiday, we are doing so without faith, for faith comes from God's word. And in that it did not come from God's word, and therefore is not of faith, Paul calls it sinful. Therefore, to observe it in a religious manner is sinful, for it is acting "not of faith". 

         But if we are aware that this is not the birthday of Christ, and we are not honoring the day as such, and we do not attempt to make it religious in any way, we have the right to have a family holiday. The only stipulation would be that it does not cause a brother, or fellow Christian, to stumble. If I were to move into an area where the belief by our brethren was that observing the Christmas season was sinful, I would not observe it for fear of causing a brother to do something they believe to be wrong.

         We need to be careful that we do not observe the religious practices of the day concerning this day. While the "tree" is a nonreligious symbol for us, what about the "star" many put at the top? What about the nativity scene placed in our yards, or under the tree? What about singing songs about the birth of Christ. 

         While these songs may be scriptural in form, might they not cause someone to honor this day as the birthday of our Lord, and so wound their conscience? It is not wrong to rejoice over the birth of the Lord, for that is biblical. But to religiously set aside a day based on paganism without scriptural authority is most definitely wrong.

         We can enjoy the Christmas season as a family holiday provided we do not make it a religious holiday, and provided it does not cause brethren to stumble.

 

 

Feature Two: an article by R. C. Oliver

 

 

R C Oliver

 

THE CELEBRATION OF CHRISTMAS

AS A RELIGIOUS HOLIDAY

 

It is with very deep and mixed emotions that I address myself to this task. I believe it is a subject that should be studied with all the honesty and sincerity that we have. This honesty and sincerity stir the emotions within us, for while in some respects I believe that the honest heart must confess that this is indeed one of the happier and sweeter seasons of the year that some honest heart must be equally moved when it considers the other side of the coin. 

Among those things that makes this the happy season that it is to many of us are the happy associations of the season, as well as the precious memories of the happy associations of that we have experienced during this same season of former years. Indeed, some of the sweetest memories that many of us have tended to cluster around this particular season of the year. Such memories make us look forward to this season from year to year. And because of the memories that it stirs within me, and because of the associations that each new year promises to bring, I enjoy the celebration of the day the world calls Christmas, and the season the world calls the Christmas season. However, my celebration of this day and this season places no religious significance upon it at all, I do not think of this as the birthday of my Savior for the simple reason that no one knows when our Lord and Savior was born. Furthermore, the Bible nowhere tells us that we should celebrate the birth of my Lord. It is not so much the babe of Bethlehem as it is the Christ of Calvary that God wants us to see, for this reason nothing is said about or celebrating the birthday of our Savior.

For many years I have been persuaded the more pagan a church is the more it will have to say and do about Christmas. I need to point out that Christmas is a misnomer. The word Christmas is a combination of two words: one is Greek (Christos) and means the anointed or Christ, and the other is Latin (missun) and means to send; hence, the combination of "Christ-mass" or "Christmas" literally means "Christ-sent". But was Christ really sent into the world on December 25th" If so we have no evidence whatsoever with which to confirm it. In fact, all the evidence that we do have tends to deny it. We must, therefore, conclude that Christmas is simply a misnomer-it is a misnaming of the day.

A second reason why I do not observe Christmas as a religious day is the fact that in no place in your Bible can you find a command that tells Christians to celebrate this annual festival. This is highly significant. Indeed, it is a challenge to every honest heart. You ask, "Why"? Simply because the work of the Holy Spirit, when giving to us the Bible, was to guide the writers of the Bible into "all truth". (John 16:13). Therefore, the absence of a command to observe Christmas makes inevitable one of two conclusions. Either Christmas is not part of the "all truth" that the Holy Spirit was to reveal, or else the Holy Spirit forgot to tell us something that Christ wanted us to know. Every person who gives some Christian significance to Christmas is faced with this dilemma. Take either "horn" you will-they are both against you! On the one hand, if the Holy Spirit left out a command intentionally, it is apparent that God does not wish for us to celebrate the birth of his Son and whenever we do we show a lack of respect for the very one we claim to love. On the other hand, if the Holy Spirit forgot to reveal something that God willed for Him to reveal, such would reflect upon his competence, thus rendering His work, the Bible, wholly unworthy of our consideration, adoration, or imitation! Believing that the Holy Spirit has revealed to us "all truth", but recognizing that nowhere has He commanded us to celebrate the birth of the Son of God Christians should refrain from placing any special significance upon this day that we are now studying-the day the world calls Christmas.

Another reason why Christians should not celebrate the birthday of Christ is found in the fact that the early Christians did not celebrate it. The New Schaff-Herzog Encylopeia of Religious Knowledge, volume 3, page 47, reads: "There is no historical evidence that our Lord's birthday was celebrated during the apostolic or early post-apostolic times."

A fourth reason why Christians should not observe Christmas religiously is: the observance of SPECIAL days is specifically forbidden in your Bible. Few people seem to realize this, and for this reason the mases are led astray. Nevertheless, the Bible reads in Galatians 4:7-11 Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ. Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labor in vain."

Notice how Paul condemns these people for observing special days, months, times, and years..." He says to them that when they do such things it is an indication that his apostolic labor with them was all in vain. Imagine, therefore, the sharp rebuke the world would receive today were it possible for the apostle Paul to return to the earth in our time! For in addition to observing Sunday the only day the Lord commanded Christian people to observe religiously, he would find professing Christians observing such unauthorized days as Ash Wednesday, Good Friday, Lent, Palm Sunday, Easter Sunday, Bible Sunday, Christmas, and a host of other days which for the most part have come to us directly from a paganistic ancestry and which have no divine authority supporting them at all! Truly, if Paul found it necessary to warn against keeping special days, seasons, and years during his time, how much more ought we, who are surrounded with all kinds of special days, seasons and holy years, to cry out against them in our time? This therefore is another reason why we ought not observe this annual festival in a religious manner.

A fifth reason why we ought not observe Christmas as a religious day, or as the birthday of our Lord and Savior is because of the origin of Christmas. Christmas did not originate with God. Christmas did not originate in heaven as the majority of people are inclined to believe. Because of this, there is not place in your Bible to which you can turn and read about this day. Because of its absence in the Holy Scriptures, we are forced to look with askance upon the whole affair as a Christian festival; however, to stop our investigation here would not be to make a thorough study of the subject. Nevertheless, the fact that it is nowhere mentioned in your Bible forces us to look elsewhere for its origin. What, then, is the testimony of history as to the origin of Christmas? Here are the facts. George Fisher, when giving us the history of A.D. 100-313 in his book, History of The Christian Church, page 65 says: "About the end of this period two festivals came in. One was Epiphany, originating in the East, not improbably with Jewish Christians and commemorating the baptism of Christ. The other was Christmas, a festival of Roman origin, taking the place of the heathen festival in honor of the sun, or of the deity bearing that name, which was celebrated at the winter solstice, or on the 25thof December..." 

The New Schaff-Herzog Encylopeia of Religious Knowledge,volume 3, page 48, corroborates the testimony of Fisher when it says: "The pagan Saturnalis and Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to be set aside by Christian influence. The recognition of Sunday...by the emperor Constantine as a legal holiday, along with the influence of Manicheism, which identified the Son of God with the physical sun, may have led Christians of the fourth century to feel the appropriateness of making the birthday of the Son of God coincide with that of the physical sun. The pagan festival with its riots and merrymaking was so popular that Christians were glad of an excuse to continue its celebration with little change in spirit or in manner. Christian preachers of the West and the Nearer east protested against the unseemly frivolity with which Christ's birthday was celebrated, while Christians of Mesopotamia accused their Western brethren of idolatry and sun-worship for adopting as Christian this pagan festival. Yet the festival rapidly gained acceptance an became at least so firmly established that even the protestant revolution of the sixteenth century was not able to dislodge it and Evangelical Christians even of the more radical types who reject or ignore nearly all of the ecclesiastical festivals, have never been able wholly to ignore it." 

Please notice, friends, why it is that neither the Protestant revolution nor the Evangelical Christians of the more radical type could not wholly ignore Christmas. Was it because originated with God? Was it because Christmas originated in heaven? Indeed, it was not; rather, it was because "the pagan Saturnalia and Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to be set aside by Christian influences, and because "Christians were glad of an excuse to continue its celebration." In other words, this is just another instance where the old tradition, "If you can't lick them, join them" has been accepted.

 

 

 

Feature Three: Sandy's Women's Corner

 

Sandra Oliver

Editor's Note: You can read weekly articles from Sandy at the following Web site:  abiblecommentary.com  "Blog for Christian Women"

        

TEACHING THE BIRTH OF JESUS TO CHILDREN

 

Every other year I teach Life of Christ to my 4thand 5thgrade Bible class. I have taught these lessons for many years, and I am always amazed at the new things I learn every time I teach them.

            One of things I have incorporated into my lessons in the first quarter is the misinformation that is often taught about the birth of Jesus. If you look at the Bible workbook lessons and the flannel graph that Bible class teachers use, you'll find several errors. 

            Sadly, this misinformation has been around a long time and has been passed on from one generation to another. What we need is to open our Bibles and see what scripture says, not what some man wrote.

            Caesar Augustus declared that the world should be taxed, and everyone was required to return to the city where he was born. Joseph was a descendant of David, and he returned to Bethlehem to pay his taxes. While they were there, Jesus was born.

            If you read the account in the Gospels, you'll discover that there is no mention of Mary riding on a donkey into Bethlehem. There is nothing about their speaking with an innkeeper or that Jesus was born in a stable.

            "And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling cloths and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn" (Luke 2:4-7 ESV).

            It is likely that Mary and Joseph had arrived in Bethlehem well before the birth of Jesus. Notice Luke says, "While they were there, the time came for her to give birth".

            It was also likely that they would have been staying with relatives. Many homes did not have separate places for animals, but they were kept in a room adjacent to their living quarters. This would explain their putting Jesus in a manger.

            December was not a likely time for the birth of Jesus, since shepherds would not have been in the field in the winter; and they would not have been able to travel such great distances in winter.

             A thorough study of the timing of Zacharias' service in the temple and the birth of John will show that the birth of Jesus occurred most likely in the later part of our August or first part of September. 

            Pictures of the child in the manger usually show three wise men bringing gifts to a stable. In Matthew's account of the birth of Jesus, we read that the wise men followed a star that took them to thehousewhere Jesus and Mary were (Matthew 2:11). 

            Because the wise men were sent home another way; and the king was unable to learn the location of the new King of the Jews, Herod decreed that all male children that were in Bethlehem two years old and under should be killed (Matthew 2:16). Joseph, on instruction from the Lord, took Mary and Jesus and fled to Egypt. They remained there until the death of Herod.

            From a study of the true story of Jesus' birth we can determine that attaching any religious significance to the holiday, bringing it into the church worship, joining with denominations in celebrating it as a religious holiday, attaching a specific date to celebrate Jesus' birth, or teaching as fact that Jesus was born on Dec. 25 is sinful.

            The story of the birth of Jesus is a wonderful story to tell our children. The focus should be on the virgin birth, the fulfillment of prophecy, and the gift of God's son to save us from our sins.

            Combining the birth of our Savior with the mystical Santa Claus, the pagan worship of trees, and the pagan custom of the giving and receiving gifts just doesn't fit the gospel message from the inspired writers of the New Testament.

 

 

Feature Four: Our Communication

 

 

Why do people fear speaking in pubic? As a professional speech communication teacher, I have often been asked that question. In addressing a group of young men of high school age, I put it to them this way. Suppose you have never played high school football, but you have always enjoyed watching it. As you were sitting in the stands you heard your name called over the PA system, and asked to report to your team's dressing room. When you knocked on the door, the coach grabbed you by the arm, gave you a uniform, and told you that he wanted you to be the starting quarterback for the second half. How would you feel? One youngster told me that he would run!

         But why wouldn't you want to be the star of the game, I asked? They reflected a minute and the answers began to come forth. Didn't really know the rules...haven't practiced...didn't know the team's plays...not in shape for football.... 

I then told them that is why they were afraid to speak in public. They could enjoy a good speech, but they didn't know the "rules" or what they could do and not do. They had not practiced. They were inexperienced, and so on.

Being able to speak in public gives you confidence in yourself. This is a great skill to learn.

 

 

 

 

Feature Five:      Bible Question

 

 

Will angels carry us to Paradise?

         The answer to this question will be found in Luke 16:19-31. Jesus is teaching us about the next phase of our life, that is our life in Paradise or Torment that we might call Tartarus. (This word is derived from the Greek word translated "hell" in 2 Peter 2:4.) 

Some list the story told by Christ as a parable, but it really doesn't seem to fit in the category of a parable. The parables that Jesus told were generic in form. A woman lost a coin. A farmer planted seed. A man found a pearl of great price. Yet in this story we have a man named Lazarus mentioned as well as Abraham. There is also communication between the rich man and Abraham.

While this does not appear to be a parable, but rather a scene Jesus was able to know about, or observe, it really wouldn't matter. Jesus never told a lie to teach a truth. In all of Jesus parables everything mentioned was common, and based on reality. 

In this setting Jesus told of a man named Lazarus that died. We know nothing about this man other than he was in poverty and in poor health. But Jesus indicates when he died he was taken to Paradise by angels. While there is much about angels we do not know, we do know that they carry out the will of God. I believe Jesus is showing us one of their works in this story. If the angels carried Lazarus to Paradise, there is no reason not to believe they will carry us to Paradise when we die, if we remain faithful to the Lord.

 

Humor

 

One Sunday morning, the preacher noticed little Alex was staring up at the large plaque that hung in the foyer of the church.  The plaque was covered with names and small American flags were mounted on either side of it.  The seven-year old had been staring at the plaque for some time, so the preacher walked up, stood beside the boy, and said quietly, "Good morning, Alex."

"Good morning, Preacher." replied the young man, still focused on the plaque.  "What is this?"  Alex asked.

"Well son, it's a memorial to all the young men and women who died in the service."

Soberly, they stood together, staring at the large plaque.  Little Alex's voice was barely audible when he asked, "Which service, the 8:30 or the 11:00?"

 

In Closing 

 

This will be the last issue of the year, hence the topics I chose for the issue. It is important that we look at things as God looks at them. I trust these articles will be of help to you. --- Bob



Remember: Past issues of "Light for our Age" can be found on this Web page:

Abiblecomentary.com/Lightforourage

     If at any time you would like to opt out of Light for our Age, simply return this email with the instructions to "Opt Out".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Light For Our Age, 585 Winding Ridge Road, Rock Spring, GA 30739