October,
2018
|
Volume
10
|
Issue
#4
|
|
"Thy
word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path."
Psalm
119:105
|
|
|
Robert T. Oliver
|
CAN CHRISTIANS
CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS AS A FAMILY HOLIDAY?
I
wanted you to read my father's article before this one. I totally
agree with what he taught about Christmas. But that still raises a
question, "If Christmas is based on paganism, how can I, as a
Christian, celebrate it in any way? Do I honor paganist practices
when I do what the pagans did? Consider the example and history of
the Christmas tree.
"Dating back centuries before Christ, cultures
brought evergreen trees, plants, and leaves into their homes upon the
arrival of the winter solstice, which occurs in the northern
hemisphere between December 21st and 22nd. Although the specific
practices were different in each country and culture, the
symbolization was generally the same: to celebrate the return of life
at the beginning of winter's decline." http://www.christmastreehistory.net/pagan
I
know there are some Christians who believe it is sinful to even make
a family holiday out of the Christmas season even if there is no
religious activity associated with their observance. The Bible teaches
us to be ready to give anyone an answer to our hope in Christ. (1
Peter 3:15). This is a Bible question and deserves a Biblical answer.
Some
might want to approach this question by asking what can be wrong with
giving gifts or having the family gather around for an enjoyable
meal? Others might respond by saying we are honoring Christ in a way
he does not choose to be honored, so that is wrong. This subject can
be "argued" for hours and not apply what the Bible teaches.
But when you come down to it, that is the only thing that matters. If
the Bible is against it, then no matter how much we might enjoy it,
we should avoid it. If the Bible does not condemn it, then we should
not condemn those that observe it non-religiously.
Let
me direct your attention to a passage that you might believe has
nothing to do with Christmas, yet one I believe that completely
answers this question. The subject in 1 Corinthians 8 is the eating
of meat that had been sacrificed to pagan gods. This was one of the
questions put before the apostle Paul. He answers the question in
verse 4, but comments further in verses 7-13. First notice verse 4:
"Therefore, as to the eating of food offered to
idols, we know that "an idol has no real existence," and
that "there is no God but one." It
was important for Paul to point out that these pagan gods did not
exist. Because of this, the eating of that meat was called by Paul, a
"liberty".
Paul,
however, has much more to say about this subject. Read what Paul
wrote in verses 7-13. "However, not all possess this
knowledge. But some, through former association with idols, eat food
as really offered to an idol, and their conscience, being weak, is
defiled.Food will not commend us to God. We
are no worse off if we do not eat, and no better off if we do.But take care that this right of yours does
not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak.For if anyone sees you who have knowledge eating
in an idol's temple, will he not be encouraged, if his conscience is
weak, to eat food offered to idols?And
so by your knowledge this weak person is destroyed, the brother for
whom Christ died.Thus, sinning
against your brothers and wounding their conscience when it is weak,
you sin against Christ.Therefore,
if food makes my brother stumble, I will never eat meat, lest I make
my brother stumble."
Notice
Paul does tell them they may eat of this meat as the bold print above
indicates. Yet, there is a stipulation given. They may eat of this meat
provided it causes no weak Christians to stumble and fall away from
Christ. Paul put it this way, if a weak Christian sees you eating
this meat they may believe you are honoring the pagan god to whom it
was sacrificed, and feel justified in honoring a pagan god in this
manner. There was nothing wrong in eating the meat, but the weak
brother must be considered.
Our
question revolves around a similar situation. We know that God did
not authorize our honoring the birthday of Christ, for we were not
given a day in which to celebrate it. Therefore, in that "faith
cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God."(Romans
10:17), and in dealing with the same subject in Romans 14:23 Paul
said: "And he that
doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of
faith: for whatsoever is not of
faith is sin."In
that God did not direct us to observe Christmas as a religious
holiday, we are doing so without faith, for faith comes from God's
word. And in that it did not come from God's word, and therefore is not
of faith, Paul calls it sinful. Therefore, to observe it in a
religious manner is sinful, for it is acting "not of
faith".
But
if we are aware that this is not the birthday of Christ, and we are
not honoring the day as such, and we do not attempt to make it
religious in any way, we have the right to have a family holiday. The
only stipulation would be that it does not cause a brother, or fellow
Christian, to stumble. If I were to move into an area where the
belief by our brethren was that observing the Christmas season was
sinful, I would not observe it for fear of causing a brother to do
something they believe to be wrong.
We
need to be careful that we do not observe the religious practices of
the day concerning this day. While the "tree" is a
nonreligious symbol for us, what about the "star" many put
at the top? What about the nativity scene placed in our yards, or
under the tree? What about singing songs about the birth of Christ.
While
these songs may be scriptural in form, might they not cause someone
to honor this day as the birthday of our Lord, and so wound their
conscience? It is not wrong to rejoice over the birth of the Lord,
for that is biblical. But to religiously set aside a day based on
paganism without scriptural authority is most definitely wrong.
We
can enjoy the Christmas season as a family holiday provided we do not
make it a religious holiday, and provided it does not cause brethren
to stumble.
|
Feature
Two: an article by R. C. Oliver
|
|
R C Oliver
|
THE CELEBRATION OF CHRISTMAS
AS A RELIGIOUS HOLIDAY
It is with very deep and mixed
emotions that I address myself to this task. I believe it is a subject
that should be studied with all the honesty and sincerity that we
have. This honesty and sincerity stir the emotions within us, for
while in some respects I believe that the honest heart must confess
that this is indeed one of the happier and sweeter seasons of the
year that some honest heart must be equally moved when it considers
the other side of the coin.
Among those things that makes
this the happy season that it is to many of us are the happy
associations of the season, as well as the precious memories of the
happy associations of that we have experienced during this same
season of former years. Indeed, some of the sweetest memories that
many of us have tended to cluster around this particular season of
the year. Such memories make us look forward to this season from year
to year. And because of the memories that it stirs within me, and
because of the associations that each new year promises to bring, I
enjoy the celebration of the day the world calls Christmas, and the
season the world calls the Christmas season. However, my celebration
of this day and this season places no religious significance upon it
at all, I do not think of this as the birthday of my Savior for the
simple reason that no one knows when our Lord and Savior was born.
Furthermore, the Bible nowhere tells us that we should celebrate the
birth of my Lord. It is not so much the babe of Bethlehem as it is
the Christ of Calvary that God wants us to see, for this reason
nothing is said about or celebrating the birthday of our Savior.
For many years I have been
persuaded the more pagan a church is the more it will have to say and
do about Christmas. I need to point out that Christmas is a misnomer.
The word Christmas is a combination of two words: one is Greek
(Christos) and means the anointed or Christ, and the other is Latin
(missun) and means to send; hence, the combination of
"Christ-mass" or "Christmas" literally means
"Christ-sent". But was Christ really sent into the world on
December 25th" If so we have no evidence whatsoever
with which to confirm it. In fact, all the evidence that we do have
tends to deny it. We must, therefore, conclude that Christmas is
simply a misnomer-it is a misnaming of the day.
A second reason why I do not
observe Christmas as a religious day is the fact that in no place in
your Bible can you find a command that tells Christians to celebrate
this annual festival. This is highly significant. Indeed, it is a
challenge to every honest heart. You ask, "Why"? Simply
because the work of the Holy Spirit, when giving to us the Bible, was
to guide the writers of the Bible into "all truth". (John
16:13). Therefore, the absence of a command to observe Christmas
makes inevitable one of two conclusions. Either Christmas is not part
of the "all truth" that the Holy Spirit was to reveal, or
else the Holy Spirit forgot to tell us something that Christ wanted
us to know. Every person who gives some Christian significance to
Christmas is faced with this dilemma. Take either "horn"
you will-they are both against you! On the one hand, if the Holy
Spirit left out a command intentionally, it is apparent that God does
not wish for us to celebrate the birth of his Son and whenever we do
we show a lack of respect for the very one we claim to love. On the
other hand, if the Holy Spirit forgot to reveal something that God
willed for Him to reveal, such would reflect upon his competence,
thus rendering His work, the Bible, wholly unworthy of our
consideration, adoration, or imitation! Believing that the Holy
Spirit has revealed to us "all truth", but recognizing that
nowhere has He commanded us to celebrate the birth of the Son of God
Christians should refrain from placing any special significance upon
this day that we are now studying-the day the world calls Christmas.
Another reason why Christians
should not celebrate the birthday of Christ is found in the fact that
the early Christians did not celebrate it. The New
Schaff-Herzog Encylopeia of Religious Knowledge, volume
3, page 47, reads: "There is no historical evidence that our
Lord's birthday was celebrated during the apostolic or early
post-apostolic times."
A fourth
reason why Christians should not observe Christmas religiously is:
the observance of SPECIAL days is specifically forbidden in your
Bible. Few people seem to realize this, and for this reason the mases
are led astray. Nevertheless, the Bible reads in Galatians
4:7-11 Wherefore
thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of
God through Christ. Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did
service unto them which by nature are no gods. But now, after that ye
have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the
weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in
bondage? Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am
afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labor in vain."
Notice
how Paul condemns these people for observing special days, months,
times, and years..." He says to them that when they do such
things it is an indication that his apostolic labor with them was all
in vain. Imagine, therefore, the sharp rebuke the world would receive
today were it possible for the apostle Paul to return to the earth in
our time! For in addition to observing Sunday the only day the Lord
commanded Christian people to observe religiously, he would find
professing Christians observing such unauthorized days as Ash
Wednesday, Good Friday, Lent, Palm Sunday, Easter Sunday, Bible
Sunday, Christmas, and a host of other days which for the most part
have come to us directly from a paganistic ancestry and which have no
divine authority supporting them at all! Truly, if Paul found it
necessary to warn against keeping special days, seasons, and years
during his time, how much more ought we, who are surrounded with all
kinds of special days, seasons and holy years, to cry out against
them in our time? This therefore is another reason why we ought not
observe this annual festival in a religious manner.
A
fifth reason why we ought not observe Christmas as a religious day,
or as the birthday of our Lord and Savior is because of the origin of
Christmas. Christmas did not originate with God. Christmas did not
originate in heaven as the majority of people are inclined to
believe. Because of this, there is not place in your Bible to which
you can turn and read about this day. Because of its absence in the
Holy Scriptures, we are forced to look with askance upon the whole
affair as a Christian festival; however, to stop our investigation
here would not be to make a thorough study of the subject.
Nevertheless, the fact that it is nowhere mentioned in your Bible
forces us to look elsewhere for its origin. What, then, is the
testimony of history as to the origin of Christmas? Here are the
facts. George Fisher, when giving us the history of A.D. 100-313 in
his book, History of The Christian Church, page 65 says:
"About the end of this period two festivals came in. One was
Epiphany, originating in the East, not improbably with Jewish
Christians and commemorating the baptism of Christ. The other was
Christmas, a festival of Roman origin, taking the place of the
heathen festival in honor of the sun, or of the deity bearing that
name, which was celebrated at the winter solstice, or on the 25thof
December..."
The
New Schaff-Herzog Encylopeia of Religious Knowledge,volume 3, page 48, corroborates
the testimony of Fisher when it says: "The pagan Saturnalis and
Brumalia were too deeply entrenched in popular custom to be set aside
by Christian influence. The recognition of Sunday...by the emperor
Constantine as a legal holiday, along with the influence of
Manicheism, which identified the Son of God with the physical sun,
may have led Christians of the fourth century to feel the
appropriateness of making the birthday of the Son of God coincide
with that of the physical sun. The pagan festival with its riots and
merrymaking was so popular that Christians were glad of an excuse to
continue its celebration with little change in spirit or in manner.
Christian preachers of the West and the Nearer east protested against
the unseemly frivolity with which Christ's birthday was celebrated,
while Christians of Mesopotamia accused their Western brethren of
idolatry and sun-worship for adopting as Christian this pagan
festival. Yet the festival rapidly gained acceptance an became at
least so firmly established that even the protestant revolution of
the sixteenth century was not able to dislodge it and Evangelical
Christians even of the more radical types who reject or ignore nearly
all of the ecclesiastical festivals, have never been able wholly to
ignore it."
Please
notice, friends, why it is that neither the Protestant revolution nor
the Evangelical Christians of the more radical type could not wholly
ignore Christmas. Was it because originated with God? Was it because
Christmas originated in heaven? Indeed, it was not; rather, it was
because "the pagan Saturnalia and Brumalia were too deeply
entrenched in popular custom to be set aside by Christian influences,
and because "Christians were glad of an excuse to continue its
celebration." In other words, this is just another instance
where the old tradition, "If you can't lick them, join
them" has been accepted.
|
Feature Three: Sandy's Women's
Corner
|
|
Sandra Oliver
|
Editor's Note: You
can read weekly articles from Sandy at the following Web site:
abiblecommentary.com "Blog for Christian Women"
TEACHING THE BIRTH OF JESUS TO
CHILDREN
Every other year I teach Life of
Christ to my 4thand 5thgrade Bible class. I
have taught these lessons for many years, and I am always amazed at
the new things I learn every time I teach them.
One
of things I have incorporated into my lessons in the first quarter is
the misinformation that is often taught about the birth of Jesus. If
you look at the Bible workbook lessons and the flannel graph that
Bible class teachers use, you'll find several errors.
Sadly,
this misinformation has been around a long time and has been passed
on from one generation to another. What we need is to open our Bibles
and see what scripture says, not what some man wrote.
Caesar
Augustus declared that the world should be taxed, and everyone was
required to return to the city where he was born. Joseph was a
descendant of David, and he returned to Bethlehem to pay his taxes.
While they were there, Jesus was born.
If
you read the account in the Gospels, you'll discover that there is no
mention of Mary riding on a donkey into Bethlehem. There is nothing
about their speaking with an innkeeper or that Jesus was born in a
stable.
"And
Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to
Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he
was of the house and lineage of David to be registered with Mary, his
betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time
came for her to give birth. And she gave birth to her firstborn son
and wrapped him in swaddling cloths and laid him in a manger, because
there was no place for them in the inn" (Luke 2:4-7 ESV).
It
is likely that Mary and Joseph had arrived in Bethlehem well before
the birth of Jesus. Notice Luke says, "While they were
there, the time came for her to give birth".
It
was also likely that they would have been staying with relatives.
Many homes did not have separate places for animals, but they were
kept in a room adjacent to their living quarters. This would explain
their putting Jesus in a manger.
December
was not a likely time for the birth of Jesus, since shepherds would
not have been in the field in the winter; and they would not have
been able to travel such great distances in winter.
A
thorough study of the timing of Zacharias' service in the temple and
the birth of John will show that the birth of Jesus occurred most
likely in the later part of our August or first part of
September.
Pictures
of the child in the manger usually show three wise men bringing gifts
to a stable. In Matthew's account of the birth of Jesus, we read that
the wise men followed a star that took them to thehousewhere
Jesus and Mary were (Matthew 2:11).
Because
the wise men were sent home another way; and the king was unable to
learn the location of the new King of the Jews, Herod decreed that
all male children that were in Bethlehem two years old and under
should be killed (Matthew 2:16). Joseph, on instruction from the
Lord, took Mary and Jesus and fled to Egypt. They remained there
until the death of Herod.
From
a study of the true story of Jesus' birth we can determine that
attaching any religious significance to the holiday, bringing it into
the church worship, joining with denominations in celebrating it as a
religious holiday, attaching a specific date to celebrate Jesus'
birth, or teaching as fact that Jesus was born on Dec. 25 is sinful.
The
story of the birth of Jesus is a wonderful story to tell our
children. The focus should be on the virgin birth, the fulfillment of
prophecy, and the gift of God's son to save us from our sins.
Combining
the birth of our Savior with the mystical Santa Claus, the pagan
worship of trees, and the pagan custom of the giving and receiving
gifts just doesn't fit the gospel message from the inspired writers
of the New Testament.
|
Feature Four: Our Communication
|
Why do people fear speaking in pubic? As a
professional speech communication teacher, I have often been asked
that question. In addressing a group of young men of high school age,
I put it to them this way. Suppose you have never played high school
football, but you have always enjoyed watching it. As you were
sitting in the stands you heard your name called over the PA system,
and asked to report to your team's dressing room. When you knocked on
the door, the coach grabbed you by the arm, gave you a uniform, and
told you that he wanted you to be the starting quarterback for the
second half. How would you feel? One youngster told me that he would
run!
But
why wouldn't you want to be the star of the game, I asked? They
reflected a minute and the answers began to come forth. Didn't really
know the rules...haven't practiced...didn't know the team's
plays...not in shape for football....
I then told them that is why
they were afraid to speak in public. They could enjoy a good speech,
but they didn't know the "rules" or what they could do and
not do. They had not practiced. They were inexperienced, and so on.
Being able to speak in public
gives you confidence in yourself. This is a great skill to learn.
|
Feature Five:
Bible Question
|
Will
angels carry us to Paradise?
The answer to
this question will be found in Luke 16:19-31. Jesus is teaching us
about the next phase of our life, that is our life in Paradise or
Torment that we might call Tartarus. (This word is derived from the
Greek word translated "hell" in 2 Peter 2:4.)
Some list the
story told by Christ as a parable, but it really doesn't seem to fit
in the category of a parable. The parables that Jesus told were
generic in form. A woman lost a coin. A farmer planted seed. A man
found a pearl of great price. Yet in this story we have a man named
Lazarus mentioned as well as Abraham. There is also communication
between the rich man and Abraham.
While this does
not appear to be a parable, but rather a scene Jesus was able to know
about, or observe, it really wouldn't matter. Jesus never told a lie
to teach a truth. In all of Jesus parables everything mentioned was
common, and based on reality.
In this setting
Jesus told of a man named Lazarus that died. We know nothing about
this man other than he was in poverty and in poor health. But Jesus
indicates when he died he was taken to Paradise by angels. While
there is much about angels we do not know, we do know that they carry
out the will of God. I believe Jesus is showing us one of their works
in this story. If the angels carried Lazarus to Paradise, there is no
reason not to believe they will carry us to Paradise when we die, if
we remain faithful to the Lord.
|
One
Sunday morning, the preacher noticed little Alex was staring up at
the large plaque that hung in the foyer of the church. The
plaque was covered with names and small American flags were mounted
on either side of it. The seven-year old had been staring at
the plaque for some time, so the preacher walked up, stood beside the
boy, and said quietly, "Good morning, Alex."
"Good morning,
Preacher." replied the young man, still focused on the
plaque. "What is this?" Alex asked.
"Well
son, it's a memorial to all the young men and women who died in the
service."
Soberly,
they stood together, staring at the large plaque. Little Alex's
voice was barely audible when he asked, "Which service, the 8:30
or the 11:00?"
|
This will be the last issue of the year, hence
the topics I chose for the issue. It is important that we look at
things as God looks at them. I trust these articles will be of help
to you. --- Bob
Remember: Past issues of "Light for our
Age" can be found on this Web page:
Abiblecomentary.com/Lightforourage
If
at any time you would like to opt out of Light for our Age, simply
return this email with the instructions to "Opt Out".
|
|
|
|
|