"Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light
unto my path."
Psalm 119:105
|
|
IT DOESN’T TURN PINK IN THE
CAN
Many years ago when I was in grad school, I had a
course that studied propaganda. One lesson that impressed me was an
advertisement campaign by the then young tuna industry. Up to that
point, most women bought salmon when buying canned fish. Someone
representing the new tuna industry came up with the idea of
advertising that tuna doesn’t turn pink in the can. This, of course,
is a true statement.
The
effect, however, was to cause women to believe that their salmon was
turning pink in the can, so they quit buying it and bought tuna
instead. It turned the industry on its ear. It wasn’t long before
everyone was buying tuna instead of salmon.
I
have often thought of this, and how this same strategy has affected
Christianity. Sometimes it is possible to tell the truth but keep
some important facts hidden. The first subject that comes to mind is
the concept of faith in the New Testament. To say that “faith” saves
is a very true statement; but if someone stops there, they are doing
exactly what the tuna industry did. Not all the facts are revealed,
and a false perception is being presented.
Before
looking at Scripture, I would like to illustrate the concept of
“faith” by this illustration. Which child has faith, or believes,
their parent? The parent told both sons he would give them one
hundred dollars if they would work all day in their garden. The first
son decided to play baseball all day instead of working in the
garden. The second son decided to work as his father requested. Both
sons believed their father, but only one son obeyed, and only one son
would receive the reward the parent had promised.
Jesus
actually taught this same concept in Matthew 21:28-31.
But what think ye? A certain man had two
sons; and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work today in my
vineyard. He answered and said, I will not: but afterward he
repented, and went.And he came to the second, and said likewise. And
he answered and said, I go, sir: and went not. Whether
of them twain did the will of his father? They say
unto him, The first….
Notice the importance of “doing the will” of the
Father. It is our faith that causes us to do the will of our Father
in Heaven. This point is further made in John 12:42.
Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many
believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not
confess him, lest they should be put out of the
synagogue:
Once again, the Bible tells us these men “believed
on Christ”, but they would not follow Him because they would lose
their positions. Stating that faith, or belief, alone saves is like
saying “It doesn’t turn pink in the can.” There is much more involved
in the word faith. They did not do the “will of the Father” and obey
Christ.
One
of the “proof texts” of those that assert that “faith alone” brings
salvation is Ephesians 2:8-9.
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that
not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of
works, lest any man should boast.
The question should be about the kind of work to
which the text is referring. Paul, in writing the letter to the
Romans referred often to “work”. Many, however, fail to get past the
“pink in the can” to see what this work might be. Paul is still
referring to this same subject in Romans 9:31-32.
But Israel, which followed after the law of
righteousness, hath not attained to the law of
righteousness. Wherefore? Because they sought it not
by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled
at that stumbling stone;
This was a common theme when Paul was addressing
those following the old law, for he further writes in Galatians 2:16.
Knowing that a man is not justified by the works
of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed
in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ,
and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no
flesh be justified.
Or note he also states this in Galatians 3:11
But that no man is justified by the law in the
sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by
faith.
Paul also teaches in Romans 1:5 that obedience to
faith is necessary.
By whom we have received grace and apostleship,
for obedience to the faith among all nations, for
his name:
Who
would dare say that if deity commands something of us it is optional? Consider
John 6:28-29.
Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we
might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto
them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he
hath sent.
Believing in God is a work, but it is a work that
God commands. What about the other “works” of God? Did God not
command these:
Confessing that He is the Christ? Matthew 19:32-33
Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men,
him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But
whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my
Father which is in heaven.
Repenting of our sins? Luke 13:3
I
tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
Baptism for the remission of our sins? Acts 2:38
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized
every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of
sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Note that Peter indicated baptism was for the
purpose of the remission of our sins.
The
Bible clearly teaches that it is our actions, brought about by our
faith, that is acceptable to God. Two examples are Hebrews 11:7, 30.
By faith Noah, being warned of God of
things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the
saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became
heir of the righteousness which is
by faith…By faith the walls of Jericho fell down,
after they were compassed about seven days.
It was Noah’s actions of building the ark
according to God’s word that verified his faith in God. Also, it was
Israel’s action of obedience, because of their faith to God’s
command, that more than likely made no sense to them. That verified
their faith in God.
Faith in God demands obedience. This is the
element that many today fail to see. We are saved by faith, but it is
an obedient faith. James clearly teaches this in James 2:14,17-18,20,22
What doth it profit, my brethren, though
a man say he hath faith, and have not works? Canfaith save
him…Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me
thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee
myfaith by my works…But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith
without works is dead…Seest thou how faith wrought with his
works, and by works was faith made perfect?
Don’t make the mistake made by many women years
ago when the young tuna industry created the commercial, “it doesn’t
go pink in the can”. We are indeed saved by our faith, but God’s word
teaches over and over that it is an obedient faith that saves.
|
|
Feature Two: an article by R. C.
Oliver
|
|
The Law and the Covenant
April 16, 1972
God
has made several covenants with man. He made a covenant with Adam and
Eve before their fall (Genesis 1:28-29), and he made another covenant
with Adam and Eve after their fall (Genesis 3:15-21). He made a
covenant with Noah before the flood (Genesis 4:13-22), and he made
another covenant with Noah after the flood (Genesis 9:8-17). God made
a covenant with Abram, later called Abraham, respecting the Christ
(Genesis 12:1-3). He also made a covenant with Abram concerning
circumcision (Genesis 17:9-14). God also made a covenant with his
people of old, the Israelites, and He made this covenant through
Moses and sealed it with the blood of animals, when He met with His people
upon Mt. Sinai, and He has also made a covenant with His people
today, the Christians, and He has sealed this covenant with the
precious blood of the Son of God Himself.
In
this article we will confine ourselves to the study of these last two
covenants, with particular emphasis upon the first of these two. The
word covenant may be variously defined. You might think of a covenant
as an agreement, or you might think of a covenant as a testament, or
as a will. Sometimes that upon which parties are agreed is also
called a covenant.
Of
the two covenants we have chosen to study, one is usually referred to
as the old covenant. This is the covenant that God made with his people
Israel when he met with them at the foot of old shaking Sinai, and
the other is usually referred to as the new covenant. This is the one
that He has made with His people called Christians, and this he made
with them at Mt. Zion. Paul affirms that we, Christians, have not
come to Mt. Sinai, but that we have come to Mt. Zion.
Hebrews 12:18-22 (ESV) “For you have not come
to what may be touched, a blazing fire and darkness and gloom and a
tempest and the sound of a trumpet and a voice whose words made
the hearers beg that no further messages be spoken to them. the
mountain, it shall be stoned.”Indeed, so terrifying was the sight
that Moses said, “I tremble with fear.” But you have come to
Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem,
and to innumerable angels in festal gathering….”
In
Hebrews 8:8-13 Paul quotes from Jeremiah, the prophet showing that it
was God’s design to make a new covenant with his people in the last
times. Verse eight reads: “For he finds fault with them when he
says: ‘Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will
establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house
of Judah,’” Again, speaking of these covenants, Paul
writes “He taketh away the first that he might establish the
second,” (Hebrews 10:9). When he took away the first
covenant, exactly what was it that he took away? That is of what did
that first covenant consist? We should let the Bible answer this
question in the same manner that we should let it answer all our questions.
What, then, does the Bible say regarding what was in this first
covenant?
In
the first place, we should turn to Deuteronomy 4:13 and begin our
study there. In that verse it is stated that “He (that is, God)
declared unto you His covenant, which he commanded you to perform,
even ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone.”
You will observe that the covenant is here defined by the Lord
himself as being the ten commandments. Notice, he said, “The
covenant, even the ten commandments.” Here the Lord specifically
defines the covenant to be the ten commandments. Therefore, the ten
commandments constituted the first, or the old covenant. But Paul
also writes by inspiration in Hebrews 9:1 and says “Then
verily the first covenant had also ordinances(that is,
ceremonies) of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.” So,
while the first covenant consisted of the ten commandments,
(Deuteronomy 4:13) it also had ordinance or ceremonies of divine
service. Therefore, the ceremonial was as much a part of the first
covenant as were the ten commandments. They must all stand or fall
together. When God removed the first covenant, He certainly did not
alter it by cutting t have in two, taking away the ceremonial portion
and leaving the ten commandments to remain. He took it all away. Paul
said “He took away the first, that He might establish the
second.”Therefore, God took away both the ten commandments and
the ceremonies of divine service all of which were included in the
first covenant. The whole covenant was taken away! If the old
covenant consisted of both the ten commandments (Deuteronomy 4:13),
and ordinances or ceremonies of divine service (Hebrews 9:1), then it
obviously follows that whenever God took away the first covenant He
took away all of that of which it consisted, that is, He took away
both the ten commandments and the ceremonies of divine service.
Indeed, nothing could be plainer! We must conclude that in taking
away the first covenant, in order to establish the second covenant, God
removed both the ten commandments and the ceremonies of divine
service.
The
old covenant remains today as it has always been—it still consists of
ten commandments and ceremonies of divine service, God did not alter
it—He did not take parts of it and make the new covenant. He took it
all away, and it is all now just like it has always been. And in its
place God has made a new covenant with His people, and while the new
covenant may have some things in common with the old covenant it was
not made from part of the old covenant. It is in every way a new
covenant, And to this covenant Christians are answerable today. In
taking away the first covenant, God did not leave his people without
law, for we today are subject to the law of the Spirit of life in
Christ Jesus. (Romans 8:1).
An
illustration might be appropriate here. The people of Alabama are
subject to the constitution of the State of Alabama; however, the
constitution to which we are now answerable is not the same as the
constitution to which residents of Tennessee were at first
answerable.
[The
Constitution of the State of Alabama is the basic governing document
of the U.S. state of Alabama. It was adopted in 1901 and is Alabama's
sixth consecutive constitution. ballotpedia.org/Alabama Constitution] (Added
by Robert Oliver)
Did the removing of former constitutions in our
state mean that the people of Alabama could thereafter do as they
pleased? Certainly not, for while it is true that former
constitutions have been taken away, each time a new constitution has
been made to take the place of that one that was taken away. In the
same sense, when God took away the first covenant, including the ten
commandments and the ceremonies of divine service, he gave us a new
covenant, and this new covenant is superior to the former covenant in
every way.
That
first covenant was made with one nation—Israel; the new covenant is
international in scope. It is intended for every creature. The first
covenant was made with God and his people at the foot of old Mt.
Sinai and the second was made between God and his people at Mt. Zion.
Of this Paul writes in Hebrews 12:18 and 22: “For you have
not come to what may be touched” this is Mt. Sinai, “but” says
Paul “you have come to Mount Zion” (see verse 22). The
first covenant was made at Mt. Sinai, and the second was. Made at Mt.
Zion. Furthermore, it would be just as reasonable for one to contend
that American citizens must go to Moscow, Russia, instead of
Washington D. C. to learn what they must do as American citizens, as
it would be for someone else to contend that Christians must go to
Mt, Sinai, instead of to Mt. Zion to learn what they are
to do as Christians.
Again,
the first covenant was given trough Moses, the second covenant was
given through Christ. The first covenant was dedicated with the blood
of animals; the second covenant was dedicated with the precious blood
of the Son of God Himself, The first covenant was established upon
some wonderful promises, but the second was established upon better
promises. Of this Paul writes in Hebrews 8:6. “But as it is,
Christ has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than
the old as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on
better promises.”
Paul
does give us a warning in Galatians 5:4 “Christ is become of no
effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are
fallen from grace.”
|
|
Feature Three:
Sandy's Women's Corner
|
|
Editor's Note: You
can read weekly articles from Sandy at the following Web
site: abiblecommentary.com "Blog for Christian Women"
STOP LITTERING
Recently,
while stopped at a traffic light, a truck pulled up beside us
advertising litter pick-up. I don’t remember the exact wording, but
it was some like, “Stop Littering” or “Don’t Be A Litterbug”.
As
the truck pulled away from the traffic light, several pieces of trash
blew out of the back of the truck, leaving a trail of litter on the
highway. Their signs on the truck meant nothing as the paper and cans
blew around the other vehicles.
This
made me think about the “litter” that comes from the mouths of those
that profess the name of Christ. Profanity, of course, gets our
attention; but the euphemisms may slip by almost unnoticed.
A
euphemism is, “The substitution of an inoffensive term for one considered
offensively explicit”.
I
am afraid some people have become so used to hearing euphemisms that
they don’t pay much attention to such language. Just as I am
uncomfortable with profanity, I am also uncomfortable with
euphemisms. These words are so common that most people don’t realize
they are just as sinful as profane words or curse words.
I
hear even little children say “OMG” or the actual words, “Oh my God”.
You may use that phrase yourself, but what are you really saying?
What about “gosh”, “golly” “gee”, “my goodness”, “darn”, “doggone”,
or “heck”? Do you ever use those words? What are you really saying
when you use those words? Let’s check our dictionary and see what
these words mean.
1. Gosh—“Used to express
mild surprise or delight (Euphemistic variant of God).
2. Golly—“Used to express
mild surprise or wonder (Euphemism for God).”
3. Gee—“Used as a mild
expletive or exclamation of surprise. (Euphemistic shortening of
Jesus).”
4. Goodness—“A euphemism
for God in such phrases as Thank goodness!”
5. Darn—Euphemism for
damn.”
6. Doggone—“Euphemism for
damn.”
7. Heck—“Euphemism for
hell.”
8. OMG—Oh my God—This is
simply taking God’s name in vain.
In
Matthew 12, we find Jesus being once again accosted by the Pharisees.
He answers them by telling them that good trees are known for their
good fruit and likewise corrupt trees are known for corrupt fruit.
Then He asks them a question. “How can you speak good when you are
evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. The
good person out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil
person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil.” They claimed to
be so righteous, but their hearts were evil. We understand this, but
the next verse hits the core of what we are talking about. “I tell
you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every
careless word they speak, for by your words you will be justified,
and by your words you will be condemned”.
James
makes it clear. “From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My
brothers, these things ought not to be so” (James 3:10). Euphemisms
are the same as the curse words they represent. So, when we use those
words, we are cursing. Someone may say, “I don’t mean that when I use
those words”. You may not mean it to be cursing, but it is. It
doesn’t matter what you think. It does matter what others think.
Consider this story.
Many
years ago, a young preacher’s wife stood outside the church building
greeting visitors on a Sunday morning. Looking around, she saw the
beautiful flowers that were growing next to the building. Her comment
was, “Gee, aren’t those pretty flowers?” A visitor was offended by
what she said. The visitor couldn’t believe a preacher’s wife would
use profanity. She told me that she was so embarrassed by what she
said. She didn’t know that was profanity.
If
a truck advertises “don’t be a litter bug” and spreads trash on the
highway, we think that company is hypocritical. If Christians claim
to be like Christ in their manner of living, including clean speech,
and use profanity or euphemisms, are they not the same?
Consider this. God
put great emphasis on His name. He told Moses to say “I AM THAT I AM”
has sent you to Pharaoh (Exodus 3:14). The Jews wouldn’t even call
Him by name. In Leviticus 24, a man was stoned for blaspheming the
name of God and cursing. In Deuteronomy 28, the people were told to
“fear the glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD”.
Cursing and the
use of euphemisms is blaspheming (speaking irreverently) of God.
There is no doubt. It is sin.
|
|
Feature Four:
Honor to Whom Honor
|
|
Brothers
Isaac Solomon, Akpan Ekott, and Uduak Okon, Elders for the Olowora congregation
in Lagos, Nigeria
These brethren were appointed in July, 2022 to
serve as elders for the Olowora congregation in Lagos, Nigeria. They
have done an excellent job serving this congregation and our Lord in
this office. Having served as an elder I know I learned much from those
elders that served before me, and my fellow elders. These men did not
have that advantage. There were no elders when they were appointed. I
ask you to pray for these courageous men. The Olowora congregation
continues to grow and prosper under their direction, and with the
work of Brother Daniel, the minister of the congregation.
|
|
Feature
Five: Bible Question
|
|
There
is one person in my life that I just can’t forgive. I try to do
everything the Bible tells me to do, but this person has just been
too cruel to me. Will this keep me from heaven?
Many people don’t take seriously what Christ
taught about forgiveness. In the model prayer we are taught to ask
God to forgive us as we forgive others. (Matthew 6:12-15). But the
parable that puts an exclamation point on this question is found in
Matthew 18:21-35).
“Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft
shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven
times? Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until
seven times: but, Until seventy times seven. Therefore is the
kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take
account of his servants. And when he had begun to reckon, one
was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents. But
forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold,
and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be
made. The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him,
saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee
all. Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion,
and loosed him, and forgave him the debt. But the same servant
went out, and found one of his fellow servants, which owed him an
hundred pence: and he laid hands on him, and took him by
the throat, saying, Pay me that thou owest. And his fellow
servant fell down at his feet, and besought him, saying, Have
patience with me, and I will pay thee all. And he would not: but
went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt. So
when his fellow servants saw what was done, they were very sorry, and
came and told unto their lord all that was done. Then his lord,
after that he had called him, said unto him, O thou wicked servant, I
forgave thee all that debt, because thou desiredst me: Shouldest
not thou also have had compassion on thy fellow servant, even as I
had pity on thee? And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to
the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him. So
likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your
hearts forgive not everyone his brother their trespasses.”
To believe you can go to heaven if you are
unwilling to forgive is pure fantasy. God’s word is plain on the
subject. If you expect God to forgive you, you must forgive anyone
that has trespassed against you.
Some believe the person must ask for forgiveness.
If that is true, why did Stephen forgive those that were in the
process of stoning him? (Acts 7:60). Why did our Lord forgive those
in the process of crucifying Him? (Luke 23:43).
Which is more important to you, your feelings
toward another, or your desire to enter heaven?
|
|
A Sunday school teacher was teaching her class about the
difference between right and wrong.
"All right children, let's take another
example," she said. "If I were to get into a man's pocket
and take his billfold with all his money, what would I be?"
Little Johnny raises his hand, and with a confident
smile, he blurts out, "You'd be his wife!"
|
|
In Closing: It is hard for me to
believe this issue wraps up my 15th year
publishing Light For Our Age. It
has indeed been a joy to share these articles with you and look
forward to another year of study. May God richly bless you as you
grow in God’s word.
[Limited
number, but a free copy is available in e-format upon request]
Basic Bible Knowledge About the
Holy Spirit Speech &
Debate
$10.00 and may be purchased
from: A
Classroom Study
Boboliver32446@gmail.com For
Lads to Leaders
$10.00
Purchase from:
Lads
to Leaders/Leaderettes
5280
West Alabama Christian Drive
Montgomery,
AL 36109
334-215-0251
lel@lads2leaders.com
Remember: Past issues of “Light
for our Age” can be found at the following Web address:
Abiblecomentary.com/Lightforourage
If
at any time you would like to opt out of Light for our Age, simply
return this email with the instructions to "Opt Out".
|
|
|
|
|